Diamond Ranch High (Data source)
Source data for Diamond Ranch High
2015
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 1090421 | 2567 | - | 2628 | = | -61 | * | (414 | / | 414) | = | -61.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Diamond Ranch High | -61 | ||||||||||||
2016
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 34124 | 2576 | - | 2628 | = | -52 | * | (405 | / | 405) | = | -52.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Diamond Ranch High | -52 | ||||||||||||
2017
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 34743 | 2570 | - | 2628 | = | -58 | * | (405 | / | 405) | = | -58.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Diamond Ranch High | -58 | ||||||||||||
2018
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 34753 | 2555 | - | 2628 | = | -73 | * | (365 | / | 365) | = | -73.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Diamond Ranch High | -73 | ||||||||||||
2019
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 34926 | 2587 | - | 2628 | = | -41 | * | (367 | / | 367) | = | -41.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Diamond Ranch High | -41 | ||||||||||||
Last steps
Compute the average
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -61 | -52 | -58 | -73 | -41 | -285.0 | -57.0 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: -24.0
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: -90.0
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent | 51% | 54% | 58% | 60% | 73% |
| Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
Pomona Unified school district | County of Los Angeles
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation: wealth/poverty.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Diamond Ranch High math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
39% less $meal
42% less $meal
46% less $meal
50% less $meal
55% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
High Schools (Public) schools in Pomona Unified (6)
| Diamond Ranch High | Fremont Academy of Engineering and Design | Ganesha High |
| Garey High | Palomares Academy of Health Science | Pomona High |