Riley/New Dawn (Data source)
Source data for Riley/New Dawn
2015
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
3 | 2260269 | 2305 | - | 2436 | = | -131 | * | (5 | / | 64) | = | -10.234375 | ||
4 | 2260272 | 2374 | - | 2485 | = | -111 | * | (7 | / | 64) | = | -12.140625 | ||
5 | 2260273 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (5 | / | 64) | = | ||||
6 | 2260276 | 2387 | - | 2552 | = | -165 | * | (6 | / | 64) | = | -15.46875 | ||
7 | 2260277 | 2364 | - | 2567 | = | -203 | * | (15 | / | 64) | = | -47.578125 | ||
8 | 2260280 | 2428 | - | 2586 | = | -158 | * | (12 | / | 64) | = | -29.625 | ||
11 | 2260281 | 2469 | - | 2628 | = | -159 | * | (14 | / | 64) | = | -34.78125 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Riley/New Dawn | -150 |
2016
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
3 | 69353 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (9 | / | 74) | = | ||||
4 | 69356 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (8 | / | 74) | = | ||||
5 | 69357 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (5 | / | 74) | = | ||||
6 | 69360 | 2403 | - | 2552 | = | -149 | * | (10 | / | 74) | = | -20.13513512 | ||
7 | 69362 | 2410 | - | 2567 | = | -157 | * | (11 | / | 74) | = | -23.33783774 | ||
8 | 69364 | 2431 | - | 2586 | = | -155 | * | (17 | / | 74) | = | -35.608108 | ||
11 | 69365 | 2419 | - | 2628 | = | -209 | * | (14 | / | 74) | = | -39.5405405 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Riley/New Dawn | -119 |
2017
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
3 | 71186 | 2294 | - | 2436 | = | -142 | * | (13 | / | 84) | = | -21.97619037 | ||
4 | 71189 | 2361 | - | 2485 | = | -124 | * | (12 | / | 84) | = | -17.71428561 | ||
5 | 71191 | 2368 | - | 2528 | = | -160 | * | (13 | / | 84) | = | -24.76190464 | ||
6 | 71192 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (0 | / | 84) | = | ||||
7 | 71194 | 2437 | - | 2567 | = | -130 | * | (13 | / | 84) | = | -20.11904752 | ||
8 | 71197 | 2377 | - | 2586 | = | -209 | * | (13 | / | 84) | = | -32.34523794 | ||
11 | 71199 | 2467 | - | 2628 | = | -161 | * | (12 | / | 84) | = | -22.99999986 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Riley/New Dawn | -140 |
2018
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
3 | 71332 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (0 | / | 70) | = | ||||
4 | 71334 | 2357 | - | 2485 | = | -128 | * | (12 | / | 70) | = | -21.94285709 | ||
5 | 71336 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (0 | / | 70) | = | ||||
6 | 71338 | 2328 | - | 2552 | = | -224 | * | (12 | / | 70) | = | -38.3999999 | ||
7 | 71340 | 2433 | - | 2567 | = | -134 | * | (16 | / | 70) | = | -30.62857135 | ||
8 | 71342 | 2387 | - | 2586 | = | -199 | * | (13 | / | 70) | = | -36.95714272 | ||
11 | 71344 | 2408 | - | 2628 | = | -220 | * | (13 | / | 70) | = | -40.8571427 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Riley/New Dawn | -169 |
2019
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
3 | 71823 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (6 | / | 71) | = | ||||
4 | 71824 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (8 | / | 71) | = | ||||
5 | 71825 | 2409 | - | 2528 | = | -119 | * | (12 | / | 71) | = | -20.112676 | ||
6 | 71826 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (8 | / | 71) | = | ||||
7 | 71827 | 2395 | - | 2567 | = | -172 | * | (13 | / | 71) | = | -31.49295765 | ||
8 | 71828 | 0 | - | 2586 | = | * | (8 | / | 71) | = | ||||
11 | 71829 | 2446 | - | 2628 | = | -182 | * | (16 | / | 71) | = | -41.01408438 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Riley/New Dawn | -93 |
Last steps
Compute the average
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-150 | -119 | -140 | -169 | -93 | -671.0 | -134.2 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: -47.2
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: -221.2
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent | 75% | 79% | 81% | 79% | 80% |
Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
San Diego Unified school district | County of San Diego
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation: wealth/poverty.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Riley/New Dawn math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
62% less $meal
70% less $meal
70% less $meal
66% less $meal
71% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
Special Education Schools (Public) schools in San Diego Unified (2)
Riley/New Dawn | TRACE |