Rose City High (Continuation) (Data source)
Source data for Rose City High (Continuation)
2015
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 1080874 | 2428 | - | 2628 | = | -200 | * | (78 | / | 78) | = | -200.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Rose City High (Continuation) | -200 |
2016
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 33870 | 2421 | - | 2628 | = | -207 | * | (78 | / | 78) | = | -207.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Rose City High (Continuation) | -207 |
2017
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 34460 | 2401 | - | 2628 | = | -227 | * | (69 | / | 69) | = | -227.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Rose City High (Continuation) | -227 |
2018
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 34463 | 2402 | - | 2628 | = | -226 | * | (59 | / | 59) | = | -226.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Rose City High (Continuation) | -226 |
2019
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 34632 | 2403 | - | 2628 | = | -225 | * | (70 | / | 70) | = | -225.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Rose City High (Continuation) | -225 |
Last steps
Compute the average
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-200 | -207 | -227 | -226 | -225 | -1085.0 | -217.0 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: -181.0
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: -253.0
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent | 76% | 49% | 63% | 72% | 82% |
Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
Pasadena Unified school district | County of Los Angeles
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation: wealth/poverty.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Rose City High (Continuation) math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
71% less $meal
46% less $meal
61% less $meal
69% less $meal
74% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
Continuation High Schools schools in Pasadena Unified (1)
Rose City High (Continuation) |