Whitcomb Continuation High (Data source)
Source data for Whitcomb Continuation High
2015
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 716306 | 2417 | - | 2628 | = | -211 | * | (32 | / | 32) | = | -211.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Whitcomb Continuation High | -211 | ||||||||||||
2016
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 22579 | 2472 | - | 2628 | = | -156 | * | (33 | / | 33) | = | -156.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Whitcomb Continuation High | -156 | ||||||||||||
2017
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 22993 | 2430 | - | 2628 | = | -198 | * | (25 | / | 25) | = | -198.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Whitcomb Continuation High | -198 | ||||||||||||
2018
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 22991 | 2407 | - | 2628 | = | -221 | * | (43 | / | 43) | = | -221.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Whitcomb Continuation High | -221 | ||||||||||||
2019
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 23170 | 2471 | - | 2628 | = | -157 | * | (33 | / | 33) | = | -157.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Whitcomb Continuation High | -157 | ||||||||||||
Last steps
Compute the average
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -211 | -156 | -198 | -221 | -157 | -943.0 | -188.6 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: -98.6
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: -278.6
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent | 47% | 55% | 49% | 53% | 50% |
| Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
Glendora Unified school district | County of Los Angeles
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation: wealth/poverty.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Whitcomb Continuation High math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
39% less $meal
50% less $meal
41% less $meal
48% less $meal
46% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
Continuation High Schools schools in Glendora Unified (1)
| Whitcomb Continuation High |