Mt. Olive Innovation and Technology High (Data source)
Source data for Mt. Olive Innovation and Technology High
2015
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 679345 | 2386 | - | 2628 | = | -242 | * | (19 | / | 19) | = | -242.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Mt. Olive Innovation and Technology High | -242 |
2016
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 21471 | 0 | - | 2628 | = | * | (0 | / | 0) | = | ||||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Mt. Olive Innovation and Technology High |
2017
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 21880 | 2422 | - | 2628 | = | -206 | * | (21 | / | 21) | = | -206.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Mt. Olive Innovation and Technology High | -206 |
2018
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 21859 | 2416 | - | 2628 | = | -212 | * | (29 | / | 29) | = | -212.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Mt. Olive Innovation and Technology High | -212 |
2019
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 22028 | 2396 | - | 2628 | = | -232 | * | (27 | / | 27) | = | -232.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Mt. Olive Innovation and Technology High | -232 |
Last steps
Compute the average
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-242 | -206 | -212 | -232 | -892.0 | -178.4 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: -175.0
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: -271.0
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent | 63% | 85% | 75% | 88% | 90% |
Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
Duarte Unified school district | County of Los Angeles
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation: wealth/poverty.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Mt. Olive Innovation and Technology High math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
54% less $meal
72% less $meal
64% less $meal
86% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
Continuation High Schools schools in Duarte Unified (1)
Mt. Olive Innovation and Technology High |