Oak Knoll Alternative (Data source)
Source data for Oak Knoll Alternative
2015
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 657651 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (4 | / | 33) | = | ||||
| 4 | 657652 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (2 | / | 33) | = | ||||
| 5 | 657655 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (5 | / | 33) | = | ||||
| 6 | 657656 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (4 | / | 33) | = | ||||
| 7 | 657659 | 0 | - | 2567 | = | * | (3 | / | 33) | = | ||||
| 8 | 657660 | 0 | - | 2586 | = | * | (1 | / | 33) | = | ||||
| 11 | 657663 | 2522 | - | 2628 | = | -106 | * | (14 | / | 33) | = | -44.96969694 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Oak Knoll Alternative | -45 | ||||||||||||
2016
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 20887 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (1 | / | 30) | = | ||||
| 4 | 20889 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (3 | / | 30) | = | ||||
| 5 | 20891 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (4 | / | 30) | = | ||||
| 6 | 20893 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (6 | / | 30) | = | ||||
| 7 | 20896 | 0 | - | 2567 | = | * | (4 | / | 30) | = | ||||
| 8 | 20898 | 0 | - | 2586 | = | * | (4 | / | 30) | = | ||||
| 11 | 20900 | 0 | - | 2628 | = | * | (8 | / | 30) | = | ||||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Oak Knoll Alternative | |||||||||||||
2017
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 21243 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (0 | / | 38) | = | ||||
| 4 | 21246 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (0 | / | 38) | = | ||||
| 5 | 21248 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (0 | / | 38) | = | ||||
| 6 | 21249 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (0 | / | 38) | = | ||||
| 7 | 21252 | 0 | - | 2567 | = | * | (0 | / | 38) | = | ||||
| 8 | 21253 | 0 | - | 2586 | = | * | (0 | / | 38) | = | ||||
| 11 | 21256 | 2511 | - | 2628 | = | -117 | * | (11 | / | 38) | = | -33.86842103 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Oak Knoll Alternative | -34 | ||||||||||||
2018
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 21227 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (0 | / | 36) | = | ||||
| 4 | 21229 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (0 | / | 36) | = | ||||
| 5 | 21231 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (0 | / | 36) | = | ||||
| 6 | 21233 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (0 | / | 36) | = | ||||
| 7 | 21235 | 0 | - | 2567 | = | * | (0 | / | 36) | = | ||||
| 8 | 21237 | 2580 | - | 2586 | = | -6 | * | (16 | / | 36) | = | -2.66666666 | ||
| 11 | 21239 | 0 | - | 2628 | = | * | (0 | / | 36) | = | ||||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Oak Knoll Alternative | -3 | ||||||||||||
2019
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 21400 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (0 | / | 35) | = | ||||
| 4 | 21401 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (0 | / | 35) | = | ||||
| 5 | 21402 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (0 | / | 35) | = | ||||
| 6 | 21403 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (0 | / | 35) | = | ||||
| 7 | 21404 | 0 | - | 2567 | = | * | (6 | / | 35) | = | ||||
| 8 | 21405 | 2520 | - | 2586 | = | -66 | * | (12 | / | 35) | = | -22.62857137 | ||
| 11 | 21406 | 0 | - | 2628 | = | * | (10 | / | 35) | = | ||||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Oak Knoll Alternative | -23 | ||||||||||||
Last steps
Compute the average
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -45 | -34 | -3 | -23 | -105.0 | -21.0 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: 24.75
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: -77.25
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent | 23% | 27% | 27% | 31% | 39% |
| Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
Charter Oak Unified school district | County of Los Angeles
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation: wealth/poverty.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Oak Knoll Alternative math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
21% less $meal
25% less $meal
25% less $meal
31% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
Alternative Schools of Choice schools in Charter Oak Unified (1)
| Oak Knoll Alternative |