Prospects High (Alternative) (Data source)
Source data for Prospects High (Alternative)
2015
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 180137 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (3 | / | 94) | = | ||||
| 4 | 180138 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (2 | / | 94) | = | ||||
| 5 | 180141 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (6 | / | 94) | = | ||||
| 6 | 180142 | 2514 | - | 2552 | = | -38 | * | (10 | / | 94) | = | -4.04255316 | ||
| 7 | 180145 | 2453 | - | 2567 | = | -114 | * | (13 | / | 94) | = | -15.76595741 | ||
| 8 | 180146 | 2502 | - | 2586 | = | -84 | * | (12 | / | 94) | = | -10.72340422 | ||
| 11 | 180149 | 2491 | - | 2628 | = | -137 | * | (48 | / | 94) | = | -69.95744669 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Prospects High (Alternative) | -100 | ||||||||||||
2016
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 5414 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (2 | / | 52) | = | ||||
| 4 | 5415 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (7 | / | 52) | = | ||||
| 5 | 5417 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (2 | / | 52) | = | ||||
| 6 | 5419 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (8 | / | 52) | = | ||||
| 7 | 5422 | 2500 | - | 2567 | = | -67 | * | (10 | / | 52) | = | -12.88461536 | ||
| 8 | 5423 | 2509 | - | 2586 | = | -77 | * | (6 | / | 52) | = | -8.88461536 | ||
| 11 | 5425 | 2504 | - | 2628 | = | -124 | * | (17 | / | 52) | = | -40.53846142 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Prospects High (Alternative) | -62 | ||||||||||||
2017
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 5532 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (0 | / | 89) | = | ||||
| 4 | 5533 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (0 | / | 89) | = | ||||
| 5 | 5536 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (0 | / | 89) | = | ||||
| 6 | 5538 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (0 | / | 89) | = | ||||
| 7 | 5539 | 2456 | - | 2567 | = | -111 | * | (14 | / | 89) | = | -17.46067407 | ||
| 8 | 5542 | 2493 | - | 2586 | = | -93 | * | (11 | / | 89) | = | -11.49438197 | ||
| 11 | 5544 | 2494 | - | 2628 | = | -134 | * | (46 | / | 89) | = | -69.25842689 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Prospects High (Alternative) | -98 | ||||||||||||
2018
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 5527 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (0 | / | 60) | = | ||||
| 4 | 5529 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (0 | / | 60) | = | ||||
| 5 | 5531 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (0 | / | 60) | = | ||||
| 6 | 5533 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (0 | / | 60) | = | ||||
| 7 | 5536 | 0 | - | 2567 | = | * | (0 | / | 60) | = | ||||
| 8 | 5537 | 0 | - | 2586 | = | * | (0 | / | 60) | = | ||||
| 11 | 5539 | 2453 | - | 2628 | = | -175 | * | (35 | / | 60) | = | -102.08333328 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Prospects High (Alternative) | -102 | ||||||||||||
2019
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 3 | 5593 | 0 | - | 2436 | = | * | (5 | / | 106) | = | ||||
| 4 | 5594 | 0 | - | 2485 | = | * | (4 | / | 106) | = | ||||
| 5 | 5595 | 0 | - | 2528 | = | * | (6 | / | 106) | = | ||||
| 6 | 5596 | 0 | - | 2552 | = | * | (10 | / | 106) | = | ||||
| 7 | 5597 | 2447 | - | 2567 | = | -120 | * | (14 | / | 106) | = | -15.84905652 | ||
| 8 | 5598 | 2458 | - | 2586 | = | -128 | * | (13 | / | 106) | = | -15.69811315 | ||
| 11 | 5599 | 2459 | - | 2628 | = | -169 | * | (54 | / | 106) | = | -86.09433958 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Prospects High (Alternative) | -118 | ||||||||||||
Last steps
Compute the average
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -100 | -62 | -98 | -102 | -118 | -480.0 | -96.0 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: -36.0
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: -156.0
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent | 46% | 51% | 48% | 52% | 63% |
| Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
Antioch Unified school district | County of Contra Costa
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation: wealth/poverty.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Prospects High (Alternative) math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
45% less $meal
49% less $meal
45% less $meal
50% less $meal
62% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
Alternative Schools of Choice schools in Antioch Unified (2)
| Dozier-Libbey Medical High | Prospects High (Alternative) |