Foothill High (Data source)
Source data for Foothill High
2015
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 2644439 | 2427 | - | 2628 | = | -201 | * | (68 | / | 68) | = | -201.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Foothill High | -201 | ||||||||||||
2016
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 80643 | 2441 | - | 2628 | = | -187 | * | (73 | / | 73) | = | -187.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Foothill High | -187 | ||||||||||||
2017
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 82859 | 2424 | - | 2628 | = | -204 | * | (93 | / | 93) | = | -204.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Foothill High | -204 | ||||||||||||
2018
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 83075 | 2426 | - | 2628 | = | -202 | * | (89 | / | 89) | = | -202.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Foothill High | -202 | ||||||||||||
2019
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
| Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
| 11 | 83686 | 2432 | - | 2628 | = | -196 | * | (97 | / | 97) | = | -196.0 | ||
| Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Foothill High | -196 | ||||||||||||
Last steps
Compute the average
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -201 | -187 | -204 | -202 | -196 | -990.0 | -198.0 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: -180.0
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: -216.0
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent | 67% | 71% | 67% | 72% | 74% |
| Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
East Side Union High school district | County of Santa Clara
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation: wealth/poverty.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Foothill High math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
60% less $meal
60% less $meal
59% less $meal
66% less $meal
64% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
Continuation High Schools schools in East Side Union High (4)
| Apollo High | Foothill High | Pegasus High |
| Phoenix High |