Silver Springs High (Continuation) (Data source)
Source data for Silver Springs High (Continuation)
2015
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 1400383 | 2424 | - | 2628 | = | -204 | * | (68 | / | 68) | = | -204.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Silver Springs High (Continuation) | -204 |
2016
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 44169 | 2415 | - | 2628 | = | -213 | * | (45 | / | 45) | = | -213.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Silver Springs High (Continuation) | -213 |
2017
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 45244 | 2480 | - | 2628 | = | -148 | * | (60 | / | 60) | = | -148.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Silver Springs High (Continuation) | -148 |
2018
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 45259 | 2436 | - | 2628 | = | -192 | * | (50 | / | 50) | = | -192.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Silver Springs High (Continuation) | -192 |
2019
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
11 | 45386 | 2422 | - | 2628 | = | -206 | * | (55 | / | 55) | = | -206.0 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Silver Springs High (Continuation) | -206 |
Last steps
Compute the average
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-204 | -213 | -148 | -192 | -206 | -963.0 | -192.6 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: -114.6
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: -270.6
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent | 76% | 74% | 71% | 76% | 70% |
Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
Nevada Joint Union High school district | County of Nevada
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation: wealth/poverty.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Silver Springs High (Continuation) math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
68% less $meal
64% less $meal
67% less $meal
71% less $meal
69% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
Continuation High Schools schools in Nevada Joint Union High (2)
NU Tech High | Silver Springs High (Continuation) |