Rolling Hills Middle (Data source)
Source data for Rolling Hills Middle
2015
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
6 | 270855 | 2569 | - | 2552 | = | 17 | * | (323 | / | 991) | = | 5.5408678 | ||
7 | 270856 | 2598 | - | 2567 | = | 31 | * | (333 | / | 991) | = | 10.41675073 | ||
8 | 270859 | 2613 | - | 2586 | = | 27 | * | (335 | / | 991) | = | 9.12714429 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2015 Difference From Standard for Rolling Hills Middle | 25 |
2016
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
6 | 7974 | 2577 | - | 2552 | = | 25 | * | (316 | / | 996) | = | 7.9317269 | ||
7 | 7976 | 2614 | - | 2567 | = | 47 | * | (333 | / | 996) | = | 15.7138554 | ||
8 | 7978 | 2627 | - | 2586 | = | 41 | * | (347 | / | 996) | = | 14.28413653 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2016 Difference From Standard for Rolling Hills Middle | 38 |
2017
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
6 | 8245 | 2594 | - | 2552 | = | 42 | * | (325 | / | 992) | = | 13.76008061 | ||
7 | 8248 | 2602 | - | 2567 | = | 35 | * | (331 | / | 992) | = | 11.67842739 | ||
8 | 8249 | 2627 | - | 2586 | = | 41 | * | (336 | / | 992) | = | 13.88709676 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2017 Difference From Standard for Rolling Hills Middle | 39 |
2018
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
6 | 8281 | 2596 | - | 2552 | = | 44 | * | (321 | / | 1004) | = | 14.06772906 | ||
7 | 8284 | 2613 | - | 2567 | = | 46 | * | (339 | / | 1004) | = | 15.53187249 | ||
8 | 8286 | 2625 | - | 2586 | = | 39 | * | (344 | / | 1004) | = | 13.3625498 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2018 Difference From Standard for Rolling Hills Middle | 43 |
2019
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Mean Scale Score from line numbers in this data file. | Subtract 'met min' Scale Score. from Mean Scale Score to get Distance From Standard | Multiply Distance From Standard by proportion of students in grade. | ||||||||||||
Grade | Line number |
Mean Scale Score |
- | Scale Score: met min |
= | Distance from standard |
* | (Students tested in grade |
/ | Students) tested in school |
= | Weighted Distance From Standard |
||
6 | 8333 | 2600 | - | 2552 | = | 48 | * | (328 | / | 980) | = | 16.0653061 | ||
7 | 8334 | 2607 | - | 2567 | = | 40 | * | (311 | / | 980) | = | 12.69387752 | ||
8 | 8335 | 2635 | - | 2586 | = | 49 | * | (341 | / | 980) | = | 17.04999997 | ||
Step 4 | SUM Weighted Distance From Standard to get 2019 Difference From Standard for Rolling Hills Middle | 46 |
Last steps
Compute the average
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Sum | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 | 38 | 39 | 43 | 46 | 191.0 | 38.2 |
Compute the Upper Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and add to the average: 62.2
Compute the Lower Control Limit
Simply compute the standard deviation and multiply by 3 and subtract from the average: 14.2
For the lines, you have the data necessary to plot the chart.
Very last step
The percent of students getting a Free or Reduced Price Meal comes from the following sources:
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent | 7% | 7% | 8% | 10% | 9% |
Data source | 2015 data file | 2016 data file | 2017 data file | 2018 data file | 2019 data file |
Buckeye Union Elementary school district County of El Dorado
THIS chart shows what the school system "wants"
PLUS a "special" or "outside" cause of variation, parent education.
NOT what teachers want.
NOT what principals want.
NOT what parents want.
Rolling Hills Middle math proficiency
Zero+ meets standard.
7% less $meal
6% less $meal
7% less $meal
9% less $meal
7% less $meal
• Any result above zero is proficient; below is not proficient. • There is a 99% chance that results will remain the same in coming years, which is to say, between the Upper and Lower Control Limits (the gray lines). • The houses with the % of students receiving a Free or Reduced Price Meal is a measure of wealth/poverty.
Intermediate/Middle Schools (Public) schools in Buckeye Union Elementary (2)
Camerado Springs Middle | Rolling Hills Middle |